furiously$30468$ - traduction vers néerlandais
Diclib.com
Dictionnaire ChatGPT
Entrez un mot ou une phrase dans n'importe quelle langue 👆
Langue:

Traduction et analyse de mots par intelligence artificielle ChatGPT

Sur cette page, vous pouvez obtenir une analyse détaillée d'un mot ou d'une phrase, réalisée à l'aide de la meilleure technologie d'intelligence artificielle à ce jour:

  • comment le mot est utilisé
  • fréquence d'utilisation
  • il est utilisé plus souvent dans le discours oral ou écrit
  • options de traduction de mots
  • exemples d'utilisation (plusieurs phrases avec traduction)
  • étymologie

furiously$30468$ - traduction vers néerlandais

SENTENCE COINED BY NOAM CHOMSKY TO DESCRIBE PROPER SYNTAX WITH IMPROPER SEMANTICS
Colourless green ideas sleep furiously; Colorless green ideas; Colourless green ideas; Green ideas; Furious sleep; Furiously sleep ideas green colorless; Green ideas sleep furiously; Colorless green ideas sleep furiously.; CGISF; Colourless green thoughts sleep furiously; Colorless green thoughts sleep furiously
  • X-Bar]] representation of ''Colorless green ideas sleep furiously''. See [[phrase structure rules]].
  • Approximate representation of "Colorless green ideas sleep furiously". See [[Minimalist Program]].

furiously      
adv. woedend, laaiend; wild, razend, energiek

Wikipédia

Colorless green ideas sleep furiously

Colorless green ideas sleep furiously was composed by Noam Chomsky in his 1957 book Syntactic Structures as an example of a sentence that is grammatically well-formed, but semantically nonsensical. The sentence was originally used in his 1955 thesis The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory and in his 1956 paper "Three Models for the Description of Language".: 116  There is no obvious understandable meaning that can be derived from it, which demonstrates the distinction between syntax and semantics, and the idea that a syntactically well-formed sentence is not guaranteed to be semantically well-formed as well. As an example of a category mistake, it was used to show the inadequacy of certain probabilistic models of grammar, and the need for more structured models.